Leopold FC660C: better stock Topre experience than the HHKB

topre vs cherry This is a topic that many people are looking for. star-trek-voyager.net is a channel providing useful information about learning, life, digital marketing and online courses …. it will help you have an overview and solid multi-faceted knowledge . Today, star-trek-voyager.net would like to introduce to you Leopold FC660C: better stock Topre experience than the HHKB. Following along are instructions in the video below:

“You re looking for that genuine topre nexperience. You don t have that many options options from topre themselves. You have the cheaper ntype heaven. As well as the realforce at some point in the past cooler.

Master produced nthe novatouch. Tkl and fujitsu makes the ever so popular hhkb in the mix is a korean manufacturer leopold nwho. Produces the c line of keyboards. This is one of them the fc660c.

I just happened to have an hhkb so i ll nbe drawing some comparisons throughout the review. The 660c is the only topre keyboard offered nin the 65 layout. It follows the 660 or the 66 key layout. That s nfound in other leopold keyboards as mentioned in videos about others of this nlayout.

I m a fan of how it looks that little bit of negative space. Really adds nto the charm. The overall design is very simple and understated. Only the front side is perpendicular to the nresting surface the left and right sides have the most slight nangle inward with the back being the most aggressive.

But still very conservative the bezels are about 5 millimeters. Thick nand. The keyboard is high profile topre keycaps. Have this extended perimeter non.

The bottom. And the bezels come up to just cover the top of that on the back. There is a mini usb port. That s napproximately three quarters of the way from the left this doesn t really bother me.

But it just nseems like an arbitrary position for the port on the front side of the board. There is a nprint of a capacitance equation..

This is a nod to the capacitive sensing used non topre keyboards on the back. There are four rubber feet as nwell as two rubber tipped flip out feet. I find the default angle to be good enough. There are also these dip switches whose functions ni ll get into later the one.

I have here is the black model which ncame with gray keycaps within this generation. There was a white nmodel with white alphas and gray mods which i like a little more in the upcoming generation of this keyboard. Nthere is a black case and black keycaps sku. Which is sort of like the hhkb as well as na gray and blue color that leopold has been pushing recently.

I like the blackout one. But i m really nnot a big fan of the blue and gray color scheme. I just think that particular shade of blue nlooks cheap all in all the 660c employs a very safe and nsimple design. And i m a big fan as far as plastic stock keyboards go this nis built very well.

It weighs quite a bit for its size especially nwhen compared to the hhkb. The grippy rubber feet ensures that there nis zero sliding whatsoever. Which sadly can t be said about the venerable hhkb. The keycaps are standard fare for topre boards.

They even have the same markings on the underside as such they are dye sublimed pbt that measures nin at around 1 millimeter. In thickness. This printing method s durability is second nonly to doubleshot ones. But i don t think that s been done yet for topre keyboards.

The font on this is quite a bit different nfrom. The ones found on the hhkb. The alphas are a thin italicized font and nsome of the mods like the shift and tab keys include more symbols than on the smaller board. I don t really have a preference for either nbut.

It is good to see some variety you can disassemble. The board by removing nthis one screw that resides under a do not remove sticker and then you have to go all around the edge nto release..

The clips. The clamshell design of the fc660c is more nrobust than that found on the hhkb here both the bottom and top pieces have nwalls that overlap while the hhkb is more of a discrete top and bottom as typical in topre keyboards. The main sensing npcb is attached to a daughterboard. This can be replaced with an aftermarket controller nmade by hasu.

Which offers programmability also typical in topre keyboards. The main npcb is attached to the rest of the assembly by no less than ten thousand screws. So if nyou mess up a mod. It ll be a long time.

We can see here a main difference between nthis and the hhkb. The metal backplate. This is the biggest contributor to the weight nas well as the feel and sound of the board as mentioned in previous videos. Topre switches nhave a feel that doesn t quite have an analogue in mx style switches the closest thing to it that i ve personally nfelt are jailhouse blues.

But even they are distinct. But when compared to other topre keyboards nit s mostly the same which i guess makes sense since they have the same 45g domes. There are differences. But they re going nto be pretty minor in the grand scheme of things so the comparisons that follow are nreally nitpicks compared to the hhkb.

The bottom out feel nis more solid. This is due to the unyielding metal backplate nas opposed to the plastic one in the hhkb of the minor differences. This is the most nnoticeable. It makes the typing feel more confident actually so much so that i perceive the overall ntravel distance to be reduced on the leopold.

This is mostly going to come down to preference nbut. I do prefer the additional solidness next is the sound of course by having additional mass in the nkeyboard. The overall volume is reduced on the 660c when compared to the hhkb when comparing bottom out sound. Alone.

The nleopold has a more dampened and deeper tone while the hhkb sounds a little more hollow. The return noise for me makes the biggest nimprovement over the hhkb..

I ve complained in the past that i think nstock hhkbs sound like stabilizer rattle on every single key. I know that might make some of you mad. But ni 100 stand by it on the other hand the return noise on the nleopold is a lot more refined and soft it does still sound rattly and i would be ntrying to explore silencing options if i kept this board. But i do like this much better nthan the hhkb coincidentally the actual stabilizers on nthe 660c is a lot worse if you tap on any of the longer keys you nwill hear some rattle while there will be none on the hhkb.

This of course can be easily fixed with some nlube but just a thing to note have a listen yourself anyway when both boards are stock in all naspects of typing i prefer the leopold over the hhkb. The biggest factor in this preference is the nsuperior to me sound on the 660c here s a quick little test between the two being a pretty compact keyboard. The layout nis of interest. I do think 65 boards are very attractive nespecially in their aspect ratio.

But you may have some usability concerns of course. This is going to be different for npeople and their use cases. But i wish there were a couple different options on the 660c. My first complaint is that the two auxiliary nkeys on the upper right corner is pretty much useless to me.

I m a programmer and use home and end. Very. Nfrequently and while i might use delete from time to time. I pretty much never ever use ninsert.

I wish there were a couple dip switches that nwould allow you to configure what keys went. There i know home and end are accessible with function nleft and right arrow or function k or comma. But the placement of the function. Key is just nkind of inconvenient to me i used it for two weeks at work and i got nused to it.

But it s not really something i like you do have the option to switch control and ncapslock through the dip switches. But i had a little trouble getting used to that because njust the presence of that lower left corner key compelled me to press. It i think for me to get the most utility out nof this layout. I would need to get that aftermarket controller to place my function key on caps.

Nlock and adding dedicated home and end. However compared to the hhkb..

The layout nis more readily adaptable to most people. And my complaints aren t really huge deal nbreakers for most use cases. Including a lot of other programmers so in my eyes. This keyboard is better than nthe hhkb in pretty much every category.

It doesn t feel like a toy. It has proper nrubber feet for all four corners rather than dumb hard plastic pimples and overall. It s njust a vastly superior experience. When compared right out of the box.

I think this sentiment is often echoed in nthe community. I think a lot of people agree that the hhkb nneeds a bit of work before it can live up to all of that hype. So if you like topre and maybe you re coming nfrom a realforce or a type heaven. This is going to be familiar territory.

If you re coming from a hhkb. This is going nto be kind of weird and you might think it s too harsh. But these are just two different styles of nthe same switch and both have their merits to me the most important distinction between nthis and the hhkb is the sound. And it s perfectly fine for you to like the hollowness non the pfu board.

But i greatly prefer the dampened sound on the metal plate. I think. This is my 4th or 5th hhkb. And i nonly bought it to compare it against the 660c and at least.

I can say that i m consistent nbecause. I still don t like it ” ..

Thank you for watching all the articles on the topic Leopold FC660C: better stock Topre experience than the HHKB. All shares of star-trek-voyager.net are very good. We hope you are satisfied with the article. For any questions, please leave a comment below. Hopefully you guys support our website even more.


Leave a Comment