Intel Pentium vs. Core i3 vs. Core i5 vs. Core i7 – What do Gamers get by spending more?

pentium vs i3 This is a topic that many people are looking for. is a channel providing useful information about learning, life, digital marketing and online courses …. it will help you have an overview and solid multi-faceted knowledge . Today, would like to introduce to you Intel Pentium vs. Core i3 vs. Core i5 vs. Core i7 – What do Gamers get by spending more?. Following along are instructions in the video below:

“A while now i ve wanted to create a video that compares gaming performance of of various. Intel processors from gamers. Perspective of course. The driving force behind this idea been you guys the hardware.

Unbox. Tribe. My loyal sub region. It s an interesting question that isn t easily answered.

Hence. The need to create this video ultimately it comes down to two things first and foremost the types of games you play if rama succeeds is all your plan on playing for example. Then don t bother upgrading that core i3. It won t get you any extra performance.

This is because rainbow. Six siege is primarily a gpu bound game which means you ll be far better off investing in your graphics card. Than your cpu for this title on the other hand games such as civilization beyond earth for example require great deal of cpu firepower. And this is where your money.

We best spend for performance gains of course. We re talking about gaming performance so regardless of the title the gpu plays a key role in fact your graphics card really dictates just how useful your cpu is going to be even in cpu intensive games. For example pairing a low end gpu such as the radeon r7 370 with a powerful processor such as the core i7 6700 k. Won t be doing you any favors.

This is because a much slower processor such as the core i3 6100 will deliver the same performance regardless of how cpu intensive the title is so obviously. There s a balance to be had between cpu and gpu power. There probably being finding that perfect balance in an effort to discover this i ll be testing a huge range of intel skylake processors from the lowly pentium g. 4400 to the mighty kora 760 700 k.

Using three different gpus. The graphics cards in question of the radeon r9 fury. Acts r9 390 and i9 380. Please note.

That due to the fact. I ve tested eight schaick processors using three different graphics cards. Only five games have been used however i feel these five games paint a very clear picture and by that i mean they give a good indication with cpus best compliment. Which graphics cards even though.

I ve only tested five titles. There s a good mix of cpu and gpu intensive games. The mostly gpu intensive games. Used include far.

Cry primal and rise of the tomb. Raider while the cpu intensive games. Include the witcher. 3.

Wild hunt civilization beyond earth and ashes of the singularity finally. I d just like to point out that all testing takes place at 1080p. There s little point testing cpu performance at any resolution. Greater than 1080p as high resolutions will result in gpu bottlenecks in fact.

We re already seeing is a 1080p on the i 90 380. So if you re running at 1440p or higher for example. You can expect the performance margins to be reduced. When compared to what i m about to show you ok so far.

Cry primal. Doesn t support dual core processors. As many of the game s main assets run on the third thread. So i couldn t test the pentium processors moving forward.


We see that even with a fury x. Installed. The game. Doesn t appear particularly cpu intensive.

As the core i3 6100. Was just 10 slower than the 6700 k. When comparing the minimum frame rate. Interestingly despite the slight variation in the minimum frames.

The majority of the processors tested produced the same 72 fps average frame rate. Lowering the gpu rendering power with the radiant. I know 390 we see that the core i3 core i5 and core i7 processors. All deliver the same performance downgrading.

The gpu further with the r9 380. We again find that all tested processors deliver the same performance rise of the tomb raider can make good use of multi core processors. But i wouldn t describe it as cpu intensive here the core i7 6700 k. Was just 14 percent faster than the g 4400.

When comparing the minimum frame rates. While the core i5 6400 was just 8 percent faster now with the i 9 390 installed the core i7 6700 k. Is just 7 percent faster than the g 4400. What s a very slim margin indeed that said the g.

4400 clearly wasn t hitting the same high as the average frame rate was a bit slower. Though. This was corrected with the g 45. 20.

Here. We see that with the r9 380 installed all eight processes. Deliver pretty much the same result in fact all of them do with the exception of the g 4400. Which was a whiskey slower despite testing.

The witcher 3 in the cpu intensive town of novigrad. We don t see a huge difference in performance from the g 4400 to the 6700 k. When using the fury x. In fact here.

The 6700 k. Was just 8. Faster. Which i have to say was a real surprise moving to the r9 390.

Saw a much larger variation in performance. When comparing the dual core. Pentium processors. The four threaded core.

I3. And ultimately quad core core. I7 processors. It s a bit strange.

That this wasn t seen with the fury x. But these are much more in line. With the results that i was expecting to find here the core i3 6100 was able to get the most out of the radeon r9. 390.

And was 22 faster than the g 4400. The core i5 6400 was actually slightly slower than the core i3 processors due to its much weaker core clock. Speed. Now with the lowly r9 380.


Installed. It appears that the processor becomes. Far less important as the pentium g. 45.

20. Was able to match the core i3. I5 and i7 processors. Probably the most cpu intensive game featured in this video is civilization beyond earth.

Here. The 6700 k. Was 66 percent faster than the g. 44.

Hundred and fifty six percent faster than the g 45. 20. When comparing the minimum frame rate. The 6700 k.

Was also 33 faster than the core i3. 63. 20. And 10 faster than the 6600 k.

Going. With a slower gpu in the o9 390. Only reduced the 6700 k is lead over the g 4400 by a small amount as it s now 61 percent faster the low clocked core i5 6400. Was only able to match the core i3.

63. 20. You want a much higher clock. 6600 k.

Match. The 6700. Even with the iodine 380 handling the rendering work. The 6700 k.

Was still 53 faster than the g 4400. Which dropped down to the 32 fps. It s important to note that while the average frame rates don t show much of a difference in performance. The minimums.

Tell a different story ashes of the singularity provides us with a look at both directx. 11. And directx 12 performance unfortunately. I m only able to compare the average frame rates as the game.

Doesn t report the minimum frame rate. And i ve no other means of recording and under directx. 12. As programs like fraps don t work.

Nevertheless. The results are very interesting. The pentium results the most noteworthy for a few reasons firstly. Although the directx 11 performance is quite weak when compared to the mighty core i7 processors.

It isn t that bad when compared to the core i3 and lower clocked core i5 6400 processors. The pentium g. 4400. Was 24 slower than the core i5.


6400. For example not a bad. Result. Given.

The core i5 processor. Has twice as many cores to play with. However once we move to directx 12 g. 4400 becomes.

28. Slower than the 6400 well the pentium pro is fall behind the core i3 processors are able to roughly match the core i5s and therefore the core i7 processors. It is worth noting that although the pentium processors didn t perform as well under directx. 12.

They still received a healthy 45 performance boost when compared to directx. 11. Similar performance trends are seen. When using yarn and 390 g.

4400. Received 47 performance boost when using directx 12. This mean. It was still over 20 slower than the core i3 processors in the more modern api on the other hand the core i3 i5 and i7 processors.

All delivered similar performance when using directx 12. Now using the r9 380. The gpus limits seem to be reached at 39 fps. Under directx.

11. As evidenced by the core i7. 6700 and 6700 k. Results.

This meant that the g 4400. Was 28 slower. While the core i3 in core i5. 6400 processors were just 8 slower retesting using directx 12.

We find that all eight processors produce the exact same result of 41 fps. So what can we take away from all this testing well firstly as many of you already know. There isn t a great deal of difference between the core i5 and core i7 processors when it comes to gaming. This is particularly true when comparing the unlocked 6600 k.

And 6700 k processors to higher frequencies such as four and a half gigahertz and beyond looking at the other end of the core i5 spectrum. We find the core i5 6400 a. Processor that can t work any faster than 33. Gigahertz.

And will often be found running below three gigahertz during heavy loads as a result. The higher clocked core. I3 processors were able to match. And even beat.

The 6400 in cpu intensive games. Such as civilization using the following line graphs as an example. We see the core i3 6320 is capable of matching. The core i5 6400.

When using high end gpus. Such as the fury. X. 6600.


K. Is 6700 are also comparable. While the 6700 k. Only appears faster due to its higher out of the box operating frequency.

It s clear that civilization in games like it played best when at least four threads are available. Providing you meet that criteria the next. Important criteria is the clock speed of the physical cores. The importance of the cpu clock speed becomes obvious when comparing the two core i5 processors.

However although civilization is primarily a cpu bound game the performance difference between say the g. 4400. 6700. K.

Wouldn t be as extreme with lower end gpus in fact out of interest. I threw in the gtx 750ti. A popular choice amongst budget gamers. What i found was every single one of the cpus featured in this video allow for an average frame rate of 45 fps with a minimum of 31 fps.

This then is why it s so important to match your gpu to your cpu or vice versa. The budget game is using low end gpus that little need for a core i5 processor. As it s very rarely going to be more useful in a core i3 or in this case. A dual core pentium processor.

It is becoming harder and harder to justify investing in a dual core processor. Like the 60 g. 4400. Still given the performance that can be had in most modern titles.

Along with the fact that it cost half as much as the core i3 6100. You can t go to wrong. Conveniently. Picking up an affordable pentium processor.

Now still leaves the option to upgrade down the track. So. It s not a dead end scenario rise of the tomb. Raider for example plays surprisingly.

Well on modern dual core. Processors. Such as the g. 4400.

Or g. 45. 20. In fact depending on the gpu.

Being used there might be little to no performance gain to be had when opting for a more powerful core i5 or core i7 processor. So the answer to which cpu do i need still isn t a simple one. But it ultimately comes down to which games you play in to a lesser degree the graphics card you ll be using as a rule of thumb sub 100. Cpus should be paired with the modern gpu they cost an excess of 150.

The gtx 950 or r7 370. Would be suitable. The core i3 processors work well with the gtx 960 or r9 380. While the core i5 and faster are best paired the i know 390 gtx 970 or faster.

I hope you found this video useful. I m your host matt as always if you have any questions at all then please leave them in the comments have a great day and i ll see you guys next time ” ..

Thank you for watching all the articles on the topic Intel Pentium vs. Core i3 vs. Core i5 vs. Core i7 – What do Gamers get by spending more?. All shares of are very good. We hope you are satisfied with the article. For any questions, please leave a comment below. Hopefully you guys support our website even more.


Leave a Comment